BY STUART PFEIFER Think you can guess the winners of all 67 games in this spring’s NCAA men’s basketball tournament? Warren Buffett is betting a fortune that you can’t. In what may be the largest sports bet in history, Buffett’s Berkshire Hathaway Inc. will pay $1 billion to the person who correctly guesses the winner of every game during the March Madness classic. Quicken Loans Inc., the contest sponsor, is paying an undisclosed premium to Buffett for his promise to pay the winner — if there is one. “This will be the most fun. Just imagine if there’s one person left at the last game,” Buffett said Tuesday. “I will go to that final game with him or her and I’ll have a check in my pocket…. I think we’ll be rooting for different teams.” The odds of correctly forecasting 67 games are extraordinarily thin. Even a skilled handicapper would have about a 1-in-1-billion chance of completing a perfect bracket, said Ezra Miller, a Duke University mathematics professor. Buffett said the idea for the contest was his. He said he was talking sports with Quicken Loans’ founder and chairman, Dan Gilbert, in November when he pitched the idea of insuring a $1-billion prize for a perfect NCAA bracket. Quicken and Berkshire announced the contest Tuesday. It will open March 3 to the first 10 million households that sign up online. The winner will have the option of taking 40 annual payments of $25 million or a lump sum of $500 million. Multiple winners would split the money. Quicken also will award $100,000 each to the contest’s 20 most accurate brackets to use toward buying, refinancing or remodeling a home. Other companies have offered $1 million for a winner, but no one has come close to Buffett’s idea — except Buffett himself. In 2003, he backed a Pepsi Cola-sponsored $1-billion contest that involved numbers printed in bottle caps and a monkey drawing the final numbers. Berkshire, which owns a stake in rival Coca-Cola Co., ended up off the hook: There was no winner. Buffett said one of his insurance companies is writing the Quicken policy at a price that neither he nor Quicken would disclose. “Dan would say it’s too much, I would say it’s too little,” Buffett said of the premium. He said the deal is not that different from many other insurance transactions his companies conduct. He evaluated the potential risk and then set a premium that gives him an edge against the probability of having to make a payout. “We own Geico. We insure 10% of all the cars in the United States. You evaluate the risk and you charge a premium of what you think is appropriate,” he said. “Overall, if you’re pricing it right, you should end up with a profit.” Miller, the Duke professor, came up with his 1-in-1-billion probability through an equation that placed games into categories ranging from close games that could go either way to near locks. Based on his finding, Buffett would need to charge a premium of about $10 million to break even against his expected results, Miller said. “If I were Warren Buffett, anything over $10 million, I would probably do it,” Miller said. “If $1 billion were going to ruin me, I wouldn’t. But it’s not going to ruin Warren Buffett.” Buffett said his company is big enough to survive such a hit. “We’ve lost more money in a given event before,” Buffett said. “Hurricane Katrina probably cost us $3 billion. “We will put more at risk in a given insurance transaction than anyone in the world. But we have more capital than anyone in the world.” Jay Farner, Quicken’s president and marketing chief, said his company would benefit from the contest in two ways — news coverage and access to the email addresses of millions of potential customers. Anyone who enters the contest will have the option of receiving email offers from Quicken, he said. “The more familiar Americans are with Quicken Loans, what we’re really about, the higher probability they’ll close a loan with us,” Farner said. “We wouldn’t be investing the money, energy and time if we didn’t think it would be worthwhile.” Berkshire Hathaway investors can take comfort in some news Buffett disclosed Tuesday. He said he would probably strike a deal — at significantly less than $1 billion — with anyone who gets deep into the tournament without missing a game. “If you get to the Final Four with a perfect bracket, I may buy you out of your position,” Buffett said. “I’ll make you an offer you can’t refuse.” Buffett said Quicken would run the contest, but Berkshire would be in charge of security. “There’s a long history of people trying to make sports bets after the game is over,” he noted.
FRESH!!!!!! The slipstream high-top sneaker boot has an upper crafted from calf suede and technical nylon, with street-inspired features including a thick rubber sole and a padded tongue. The sneaker is completed by the luxurious addition of a grosgrain ribbon and metal LV buckle. The sneakers are available in three colorways including black, marine and deep blue, directly from Louis Vuitton for $830 USD.
One of our favorite new releases from Cartier’s 2014 Novelties is the stunning Rotonde de Cartier Day & Night. Day and Night is indicated by an intricately detailed disc that rotates to reveal a sun and moon design while a retrograde hand detailed with a tip shaped like a crescent moon indicates the phases of the moon. Cartier
The basic premise of Beats Music, which officially launched today, is that it’s the same as its many competitors‑‑see Spotify, Rhapsody, Slacker, Rdio, Sony Music Unlimited, Xbox Music, Muve, Google Music and, likely later this year, Deezer and YouTube– it’s a subscription service of a large on-demand catalog of music. But Beats operates like a cross between your friends’ meticulously organized iTunes library, a Songza-like custom playlists, and as CEO Ian Rogers put it in an interview with Billboard.biz, “the endcaps at Amoeba Records with the staff picks”. The concept is compelling, but the interface isn’t simple or intuitive enough for the mainstream consumer the company plans to target. The service launched in the app store early this morning. After playing around with it for most of the day, here are the hits and misses: WHAT WORKS: Beats Music Launches on Cue Beats Music: A Step-By-Step Walk Through AT&T To Offer $15-A-Month Beats Music Family Plan 1.It’s Organized No scrolling through a feed of live albums and compilations to get to what you want to find. Artist catalogs are divided by albums, EPs, singles, compilations and tracks. Each vertical is easy to sort by date, popularity or alphabetically. Also, the album dates appear to mostly be accurate (looking at you Spotify). Remastered albums show the original year of release. The artist’s landing page shows the latest release, top songs, what Beats has deemed to be “essential” albums, original playlists and similar artists. Plus, no weird karaoke versions (again, cough, Spotify). 2. It’s Mobile First It has a flat UI, an attractive play button, is easily swipeable and scrollable and helps to re-imagine music organization and presentation beyond the spreadsheet format iTunes has made the norm. I can’t remember the last time I opened Spotify on my phone or iTunes on my desktop. 3. It’s Original The human curation element Beats has been touting is actually very impressive. Most artists pages come with Deep Cuts, Influences and Introduction playlists. There are playlists for specific producers and labels, moods, occasions and themes. Playlists are organized by activity, including 40 playlists for romancing and 20 for breaking up (how optimistic). There are over 30 genre pages you can follow and explore that span from Punk to Musica Tropical and are diverse but certainly lacking some subgenres. Beats has partnered with various sources to create original playlists including Pitchfork, Mojo Magazine, Rolling Stone, Rap Radar, Academy of Country Music, Target, Ellen Degeneres and more. Artist and album descriptions are pulled from Rovi, like most other digital music services, but playlists all have original descriptors. 4. Artist Control Similar to a partnership Spotify announced just two days ago, Beats is using the TopSpin artist link platform to give artists the ability to upload their own images, edit their profiles and add links to their merch. WHAT DOESN’T WORK: 1) Bugs While it is easy to get lost flipping through playlists and genre pages, it is not easy to get back to the home screen. At all. The navigation is confusing and nonintuitive. Playback can be slow and cached tracks and playlists don’t always work offline. 2) Search Because there is such a heavy push for curation at the forefront, search has effectively been pushed to the side, hidden in the left rail of the incredibly hard to find home page. Also, for the handful of curated label playlists, you somewhat surprisingly can’t search the catalogue by label, a feature others (Rdio) do well. 3) Missing Out Social sharing is limited. You can follow other users, but there does not appear to be a feed to see what they are listening to, like you can on Spotify. There is no section for new releases. This would be an easy vertical to add between the algorithm based Just For You page and or the Highlights page. The much hyped “Right Now” function, a madlib type feature that allows you to input where you are, what you are feeling and what you are doing to receive a custom playlist in return, is a fun idea but ultimately not as satisfying as the playlisting service Songza. 4) Desktop Perhaps catering to the mobile app explosion, the desktop version of Beats seems a overly-simplified version of the app, thought it is easier to get to search.
“Whatever story you tell, whether good or bad, will be the story of your life. So start telling the story of your amazing life, and the law of attraction must make sure you receive it.” -Rhonda Burnes