yo @jd shit just got real up in here!! @realcarrera is on another level. you coming back to Hollywood anytime soon?

TEST MY REALITY

Hey guys!! Very neat things are coming to the www. very soon. Like 3 BILLION new minds connected online by 2015. That is insane. Eric Schmidt @ericschmidt said EVERYBODY CONNECTED by the end of the decade!! THAT is serious talk considering you and me have already had some time to adapt to a virtual life. Has any of you learned a few things. Things that might have not been so difficult had you known better? Ever wipe out a hard drive or send an email and wished you could trash the only hard copy but learned of a digital. We are all on some sort of social network or another..or maybe not. You may choose to communicate in the Deep Web which is an isolated place of virtual exchanges not recorded by anyone. Even Google the search giant whom we all have come to rely on so much can’t wrap its crawling bots and mining tools around the Deep Web.

Who knows the best way to be SAFE online? Who knows how to communicate this to YOUR children? And who knows how to communicate to a child that doesn’t have anybody at home to teach them..in a PHYSICAL world? These are two real ways we need to be safe..BOTH equally important. Do NOT assume your child already knows. Who learned about online safety from their Grandparents? Who sends Grandparents a gift via online shopping? Think about that for a second. We are in a FLUX. Generation FLUX. Constantly changing everyday is the information we process..We didn’t even have the internet yet alone a virtual reality for me to be concerned with in High School going into college. What do we do with this new space? Who can define the visible web as Google, Yahoo, Twitter, Facebook, Global14 and the undefined and otherwise invisible space online as Deep Web and how to explain safety of using both?

I urge everyone to read the New Digital Age (newdigitalage.com) We all have some idea what life online is like with 2 Billion connected and are now being told to prepare for 3 Billion more..

How do we not know Google is not telling us what is on the DARK SIDE OF THE MOON (a boat?) because our government has ordered a filtered, indexed, defined and personalized online web for only me or you to see? I DON’T. Who would do that? MAYBE GOOGLE?! IS THAT LEGAL?! YES. OK NO!! NO? NO! OK.KO!

Who defines my reality online? …and yours? now the same can be asked as to what defines your Earth in terms of my physical Earth Russia? China? Africa? India? What does my reality tell me? not only known online as Google Earth in Google Maps but Street View? Do they match both my knowledge banks offline and online? Is it knowledge that shares a vertical and parallel truth? You should know because the true reality in your physical world does or doesn’t reflect that which can be seen or not be seen? Or is it the same? Yes! All these questions should be answered or defined in some way as we progress into the digital age of a flux generation.

Anybody have a thought about this? I am just curious if we can talk to people in Sierra Leone via email (deep web) but not Facebook (visible web) who do you think would know about such communication if it were possible to communicate to other countries? My guess is Google but then again how much is Google able to control? Ask questions and keep thinking about possible boundaries that should not be invisible. Who stops the TOXIC RADIO ACTIVE ocean water that is NUCLEAR running into the Pacific and Atlantic? Well nature is governed by the same LAW of Gravity that God has created for everybody to live and rule under. We did it to ourselves. We can’t fly to another solar system. Not enough money or gold can buy a ticket to get out of this mess we created. We will continue to create this mess unless we stop…

Learn about Deep Web. Learn about the science and technology that respects humans and nature! We have all the tools we need thanks to the internet but we are only learning as we process the truth of that which is of our reality in which we can comprehend it and in many different ways and rates that can’t be seen to the naked. Most of us can KNOW about another reality but only few of us can SEE and KNOW it is TRUTH unless it has been TESTED. If perceiving another reality you should TEST it to UNDERSTAND the language it speaks and if you KNOW the fourth dimension you KNOW it is a very real world and is at war..the reality that is being defined at this very moment can come in spirit to this world alter our vision if we are not in tune with TRUTH. We must see with our hearts and hear with our minds and speak with our tongues. Keep it in your mind that which is TRUE AND MEDITATE ON TRUTH. Amen

The spirit world can write false code to alter many things in our real world and done with false info or fake code by manipulation of numbers that are rendered to us using a pixel or screen and can not be seen online or through a screen that detects a false when tested in your very real world using pixels defining your very real spirit world of our deep web lying in the fourth dimension or any dimension beyond that..this is not my area of specialty as I am not a computer programmer nor can I write code. But here is the simple code broken down in terms I best understood it. Also remember for any body who needs this written for purpose of EXAMINATION of what is REAL..the written and the spoken WORD hold POWER when done TOGETHER.

Can different perspective of real physical TRUTH be written in code? online? Can it alter reality in my physical world only? or the entire world that I believe is real only affected? YES! No! Both? Here is what I have found that keeps me in line with MY SET OF TRUTHS THAT TEST MY REALITY (this includes the fourth dimension, and or any other dimension beyond that)

The intricate non-repeating moss-like pattern used in the Society’s house style is a representation of part of the Mandelbrot Set, which has been described as ’the most complex object in mathematics’, named after the mathematician Benoit Mandelbrot. The Mandelbrot Set encapsulates aspects of recent developments in the study of Fractals and Chaos that have revolutionised many areas of study, including biology, economics and meteorology. It also lends itself to the generation of beautiful coloured pictures of which this is one example.

The significance of the set is not immediately apparent from the mathematics behind its generation. It is introduced as a mapping onto the complex plane, where each point corresponds to a complex number (x + yi) with x and y the respective co-ordinates and i the square root of -1. When the complex number representing a point is subjected to a certain repeated transformation, the resulting value may diverge to infinity or may remain finite. The condition for a point’s membership of the Mandelbrot Set is that the value remains finite, and a monochrome version of the representation of the set is formed by making the corresponding pixel black if the point belongs to the set, or white otherwise.

The graphic representation can be generated by a computer program that is simple, but requires a substantial amount of time to run since it must operate sequentially on each pixel. It also has to repeat a simple operation on each complex number until the behaviour at infinity can be inferred. An upper limit to the number of iterations is assumed. Coloured versions of the representation are formed by assigning colours other than white to points that do not belong to the set, the choice of colour being a function (usually following a spectral sequence) of the number of iterations performed before divergence becomes apparent. Ways of reducing the computational complexity have been devised, exploiting symmetries of the mapping.

The standard way of deciding whether or not a point belongs to the set is simple in principle. Where c is the complex number representing the point, a complex value z is initially set equal to c and is then repeatedly transformed according to zi+1 = zi² + c, where the operation of squaring is according to the rules of complex arithmetic. The membership of the point corresponding to c depends on whether the value of z remains finite or diverges.

The Mandelbrot Set has an interesting relationship to an earlier type of set also allowing graphic representation, termed ’Julia Sets’ after the mathematician Gaston Julia. A Julia Set depends on an iteration exactly like that for the Mandelbrot Set except that the initial value of z is the complex number representing the point whose membership is to be tested, and c is a parameter of the set. The Mandelbrot Set can be seen as a kind of catalogue or ’road map’ of Julia Sets, since a Julia Set is a connected or fragmented pattern according to whether or not its parameter c belongs to the Mandelbrot Set.
The relevance of the Mandelbrot Set to cybernetics falls under two related headings. One is that the image of the set is fractal, in that it has a similar appearance no matter how much it is enlarged. In any graphic representation, finite resolution requires that finer details are rounded off, and there is no scale at which there will be no rounding-off. A map of an island is arguably fractal since it shows a fairly smooth coastline, with headlands and bays, although an enlarged picture would show that these contained their own smaller headlands and bays, eventually down to the boundaries of individual pebbles or grains of sand and then the rugosities of these. The fractal nature of the Mandelbrot Set can be verified by computer generation of the figure with successively greater magnification, and this has been taken to extremes where extra precision of numerical representation is necessary and the enlargement is comparable to that which would reveal individual molecules of a solid object.

Fractals are important as models of natural processes, including those of geology as illustrated by the reference to a coastline, and particularly those of biology. Many living organisms have fractal character, illustrated by the readiness with which fractal processes produce compelling representations of them, especially ferns and other plants.
Even more significant is the relevance of these fractal patterns to modern Chaos Theory. This is the study of non-linear systems whose behaviour is in principle unpredictable even though that of all their parts may be well understood and deterministic. The study is sometimes denoted as Complexity Theory, and usually this is appropriate, though it can also be misleading since chaotic behaviour is shown by some quite simple systems. Certain ’executive toys’ are examples.

Chaotic processes are characterised by a critical dependence on initial conditions and other external influences. This is sometimes illustrated by the ’butterfly effect’ in meteorology, where it is argued that the disturbance caused by a flap of a butterfly’s wings may make the difference between calm weather and a typhoon. Attempts to model meteorological and other phenomena by computer showed that the difficulties in obtaining accurate results were not simply due to insufficient precision of modelling. With increased precision the results remained equally unpredictable.

The state of a system can be represented by a point in a multidimensional ’phase space’, and within this there are ’basins of attraction’ towards different types of behaviour. A characteristic of chaotic systems is that the basins of attraction have a complicated interface like that between the dark (member) and light (non-member) areas of the Mandelbrot Set. As with the Mandelbrot Set, the interface has similar form when viewed at any level of resolution, so the basins of attraction are intimately mixed no matter how precisely the co-ordinates are specified. This means there is no limit to the smallness of the disturbance, or deviation of an initial setting, that can drastically change the system behaviour. The behaviour is unpredictable in principle, irrespective of the precision of the methods of measurement and manipulation.

The term ’strange attractor’ has been used to indicate a basin of attraction having this property of indefinitely fine interdigitation with its alternatives. The study of Chaos, or Complexity, Theory has affected many disciplines, not least biology, with the encouraging feature that principles, some of them quantitative, have been discovered that apply equally well to systems of apparently quite different kinds. Some relatively straightforward applications are to turbulent fluid flow and convection, and to the chemical reactions showing periodicity (in either space or time) studied by Prigogine and his school. Prediction of the weather is impossible with precision since it depends on a range of chaotic effects including turbulence and convection.

The example shown is just one of many attractive illustrations of the Mandelbrot Set and other fractals, and at least one illustrated calendar has featured them. Further examples, and full treatment of the topic with numerous references, can be found in the book by James Gleick (Chaos: Making a New Science, Viking Penguin, New York, 1987) or that by Heinz-Otto Peitgen, Hartmut Jørgens and Dietmar Saupe (Chaos and Fractals: New Frontiers of Science, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1992) or in the article by A.K. Dewdney (”Computer Recreations: A computer microscope zooms in for a look at the most complex object in mathematics”, Scientific American, August 1985, pp. 16-25).